The Labor Market Four Years Into the Crisis: Assessing Structural Explanations

Jesse Rothstein

Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series from Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley

Abstract: Four years after the beginning of the Great Recession, the labor market remains historically weak. Many observers have concluded that “structural” impediments to recovery bear some of the blame. This paper reviews such structural explanations. I find that there is little evidence supporting these hypotheses, and that the bulk of the evidence is more consistent with the hypothesis that continued poor performance is primarily attributable to shortfalls in the aggregate demand for labor.

Keywords: Social and Behavioral Sciences; Great Recession; Labor Market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-03-26
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (50)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2x576316.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The Labor Market Four Years into the Crisis: Assessing Structural Explanations (2012)
Working Paper: The Labor Market Four Years Into the Crisis: Assessing Structural Explanations (2012)
Working Paper: The Labor Market Four Years Into the Crisis: Assessing Structural Explanations (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt2x576316

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series from Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().