After Study for the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge (Phase II)

Francois PhD Dion, Michelle Harrington, Lisa Hammond, Joe Butler and Joshua PhD Seeherman

Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings from Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley

Abstract: This report evaluates the impacts associated with the following pilot changes that were made on and around the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge: (1) opening to traffic of the eastbound shoulder on the bridge’s lower deck between 2 PM and 7 PM every day (April 2018); (2) conversion of the westbound shoulder on the upper deck into a barrier-separated bike/pedestrian path (November 2019); and (3) conversion of an existing one-way bicycle path on the I-580 West Sir Francis Drake off-ramp overcrossing into a barrier-separated two-way path. Specific evaluations include the level of use by cyclists and pedestrians, impacts on traffic conditions and vehicle emissions, traffic compliance with the eastbound shoulder open/close periods, impacts on incident frequency, types, severity, and clearance times, and impacts on maintenance activities. These elements are to be used by Caltrans to determine whether the changes should be kept, in whole or in part. Evaluations show that the opening of the eastbound shoulder to traffic has significantly reduced travel times and incidents in Marin County through the elimination of the congestion that used to affect the I-580 East approach. While the addition of the path on the upper deck has slightly decreased peak bridge capacity and increased travel time variability on the Richmond approach, congestion on the approach remains close to historical averages. Bicycle traffic on the bridge path is highest on weekends, with an average of 483 cyclists entering the bridge on Saturdays and 355 on Sundays. Weekday traffic is much lower, at around 90 trips per day. Pedestrian traffic is usually very low, at less than 25 individuals per day. Some slight impacts from the addition of the path were also found on incident response and maintenance activities, but no significant impacts on incidents. A user survey further shows a positive perception of the path by cyclists, but a more negative view from motorists. The use of the modified path on the Sir Francis Drake overcrossing seems to mirror the use of the bridge path.

Keywords: Engineering; Part-Time Shoulder Traffic Lane; Bicycle Path; Pedestrian Path; Traffic Impacts; Traffic Safety; User Survey. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-05-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4mx3c4z5.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt4mx3c4z5

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings from Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().