Truth-Bonding and Other Truth-Revealing Mechanisms for Courts [technical version]

Robert Cooter and Winand Emons

Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper Series from Berkeley Program in Law and Economics

Abstract: In trials witnesses often gain by slanting their testimony. The law tries to elicit the truth from witnesses by cross-examination under threat of criminal prosecution for perjury. As a truth-revealing mechanism, perjury law is crude and ineffective. We develop the mathematical form of a perfect truth-revealing mechanism, which exactly offsets the gain from slanted testimony by the risk of a possible sanction. Implementing an effective truth-revealing mechanism requires a witness to certify accuracy by posting bond. If events subsequently prove that the testimony was inaccurate, the witness forfeits the bond. By providing superior incentives for telling the truth, truth-bonding could combat some distortions by factual witnesses and interested experts, including “junk science”.

Date: 2001-04-30
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3587v9sv.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:oplwec:qt3587v9sv

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper Series from Berkeley Program in Law and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by eScholarship, California Digital Library ().