How politicians make decisions under risk: a political choice experiment
Enrique Fatas (),
Tibor Neugebauer and
Pilar Tamborero ()
Additional contact information
Pilar Tamborero: Universitat de Valencia
No E2004/58, Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces from Centro de Estudios Andaluces
Abstract:
We report on an experimental study with real-world politicians. These political experts face political choice problems under risk and probability. Thus, we test the frequently observed violations of rational choice theory -the reference point effect, loss aversion, framing effects, and the common ratio effect- with experts from the field. Their choices violate expected utility theory. Nevertheless, they appear to be more rational and less risk averse (loving) in the domain of gains (losses) than student subjects.
Keywords: Subject-pool effect; experts; expected utility; prospect theory. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D72 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2004
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-exp, nep-lam and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/pdfs/E200458.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es:80 (nodename nor servname provided, or not known)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cea:doctra:e2004_58
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces from Centro de Estudios Andaluces c/ Bailén 50. 41001 Sevilla. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Susana Mérida ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).