Paying smallholders not to cut down the amazon forest: impact evaluation of a REDD+ pilot project
Julie Subervie (),
Marina Cromberg and
Working Papers from Chaire Economie du climat
We estimate the additional effects of a REDD+ pilot project offering Payments for Environmental Services to reduce deforestation by smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon. We collected original data from 181 individual farmers. We use DID-matching and find evidence that supports the parallel trend assumption. We estimate that an average of 4 ha of forest have been saved on each participating farm in 2014, at the expense of pastures versus croplands. This amounts to a decrease in the deforestation rate of about 50 percent. We find no evidence of leakage effects. Finally, we find that the project is cost-effective.
Keywords: REDD+; Payments for environmental services; Brazilian Amazon; Treatments effects; Quasi-Experiment. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q23 Q57 D12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chaireeconomieduclimat.org/RePEc/cec/wp ... 13-Gouel-Legrand.pdf First version, 2015 (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Paying smallholders not to cut down the Amazon forest: Impact evaluation of a REDD+ pilot project (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cec:wpaper:1514
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Chaire Economie du climat
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chaire Economie du Climat ().