Do Labor Market Networks Have An Important Spatial Dimension?
Judith K. Hellerstein,
Mark Kutzbach and
David Neumark ()
Working Papers from U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies
We test for evidence of spatial, residence-based labor market networks. Turnover is lower for workers more connected to their neighbors generally and more connected to neighbors of the same race or ethnic group. Both results are consistent with networks producing better job matches, while the latter could also reflect preferences for working with neighbors of the same race or ethnicity. For earnings, we find a robust positive effect of the overall residence-based network measure, whereas we usually find a negative effect of the same-group measure, suggesting that the overall network measure reflects productivity enhancing positive network effects, while the same-group measure captures a non-wage amenity.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ltv and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www2.census.gov/ces/wp/2012/CES-WP-12-30.pdf First version, 2012 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Do labor market networks have an important spatial dimension? (2014)
Working Paper: Do labor market networks have an important spatial dimension? (2013)
Working Paper: Do Labor Market Networks Have An Important Spatial Dimension? (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cen:wpaper:12-30
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dawn Anderson ().