Expanding the Domain of Policy-Relevant Scholarship in the Social Sciences

William Julius Wilson

CASE Papers from Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE

Abstract: In this paper the author argues that social scientists need to do more to provide policy-relevant research. Rapid technological and economic change raise new issues about how policy should adjust that are not adequately addressed by older and narrower approaches. The author suggests two ways in which the domain of policy-relevant scholarship can be expanded. First, social scientists should be more flexible about the kinds of data they use and the ways they use them. Preliminary data can suggest new hypotheses, which can widen debate, and ethnographic and other qualitative methods can uncover patterns of behaviour invisible in quantitative sources. Second, social theories, concepts and ideas should play a greater role in the policy arena, shaping the way policy actors think about how the world works.

Keywords: social science; policy debates; research approaches (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/CASEpaper52.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:sticas:052

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CASE Papers from Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().