How do experts think child poverty should be measured in the UK? An analysis of the Coalition Government’s consultation on child poverty measurement 2012-13

Nick Roberts and Kitty Stewart

CASE Papers from Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE

Abstract: This paper examines responses to a 2012-13 government consultation on child poverty measurement. It explores what these responses tell us about attitudes towards the child poverty indicators in the Child Poverty Act 2010, and about the extent of support for a broader approach to measurement. The study was motivated by the amendments to the Child Poverty Act put forward by the Conservative Government in 2015. Using a Freedom of Information request, we gained access to 251 of the 257 consultation responses, which came from individuals and organisations with a wide range of expertise, including academics, local authorities, frontline services and children's charities. Our analysis finds strong support for the original suite of measures and near universal support for keeping income at the heart of poverty measurement; poverty is understood primarily to be a relative lack of material resources, with income widely believed to be the best proxy measure. While there is considerable support for capturing information around other dimensions, these are generally seen as causes or consequences of poverty, or as broader life chance measures, not as measures of child poverty itself. The paper also considers the government's published summary of the consultation responses, and discusses differences between the government's interpretation and our own.

Keywords: child poverty; poverty measurement; consultation; life chances; UK; DWP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 I32 J13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-07
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/casepaper197.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:sticas:/197

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CASE Papers from Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().