EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Women More Sensitive to the Decision-Making Context?

Luis Miller and Paloma Ubeda

No 2010004, Discussion Papers from University of Oxford, Nuffield College

Abstract: We conduct an experiment to assess gender differences across different economic contexts. Specifically, we test whether women are more sensitive to the decision-making context in situations in which different fairness principles can be used. We find that women adopt more often than men conditional fairness principles that require information about the context. Furthermore, while most men adopt only one decision principle, most women switch between multiple decision principles. These results complement and reinforce Croson and Gneezy's organizing explanation of greater context sensitivity of women.

Keywords: Context-sensitivity; Distributive Justice; Gender differences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2010-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-ltv
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://cess-wb.nuff.ox.ac.uk/documents/DP2010/CESS_DP2010_004.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to cess-wb.nuff.ox.ac.uk:80 (No such host is known. )

Related works:
Journal Article: Are women more sensitive to the decision-making context? (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Oxford, Nuffield College Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wojtek Przepiorka ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:cex:dpaper:2010004