Policy Opportunities to Rectify Data Fragmentation in Health Care Supply Chain Financing

Tyler Smith, Ian Yoon, Dale Mary Matthee, Boniface Mbuthia, Katherine Klemperer, Marasi Mwencha, Kalipso Chalkidou and Pete Baker
Additional contact information
Tyler Smith: Cooper/Smith
Ian Yoon: Cooper/Smith
Dale Mary Matthee: Global Financing Facility
Boniface Mbuthia: Amref Health Africa
Katherine Klemperer: Center for Global Development
Marasi Mwencha: Global Fund
Kalipso Chalkidou: World Health Organization
Pete Baker: Center for Global Development

No 411, Policy Papers from Center for Global Development

Abstract: One in four people worldwide lack reliable access to essential medicines. This underperformance is not just the result of scarce resources; it also reflects fundamental weaknesses in how public health supply chains (SC) are designed, operated, monitored, and governed. In LMICs, complex ecosystems require strong coordination to function, yet information asymmetries and fragmentation of health, finance, and SC data leaves stakeholders out of sync. Data fragmentation drives cascading failures in health supply chain financing (HSCF) — a critical and underappreciated bottleneck. Our research into 311 unique digital systems across 47 LMICs quantifies the extent of this fragmentation. Only one country (Thailand) manages a functioning, interoperable bridge between finance and SC, despite many having the technological capacity to do so. Almost half of all systems are government-built or bespoke donor-projects, 34% have no documented standards, and six software model archetypes dominate. Most systems focus on SC delivery and monitoring, leaving upstream planning, budgeting, market-shaping, and prioritisation functions thinly covered. Persistent data fragmentation is not a technical hurdle, but rooted in political economy, stemming from historical verticalisation, misaligned incentives, vendor lock-in, and unresolved data sovereignty issues. Applying a use case-driven approach to HSCF can better align information system investments with health sector goals; we outline four that best represent country experience and feasible improvements. Further, we present six policy opportunities to strengthen governance, information infrastructure, and systems intelligence. These include specific actions to institutionalise and incentivise data exchange, finance sustainable architecture, and expand access to market intelligence.

Pages: 86 pages
Date: 2026-11-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cgdev.org/publication/policy-opportuni ... l&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/policy-o ... -chain-financing.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgd:ppaper:411

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Policy Papers from Center for Global Development Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publications Manager ().