Costs and Benefits of Rural-Urban Migration: Evidence from India
Clément Imbert and
Additional contact information
John Papp: R.I.C.E
CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)
This paper provides new evidence on rural-urban migration decisions in developing countries. Using original survey data from rural India, we show that seasonal migrants prefer to earn 35 percent less on local public works rather than incur the cost of migrating. Structural estimates suggest that the fixed cost of migration is small, and can be entirely explained by travel costs and income risk. In contrast, the flow cost of migration is very high. We argue that higher living costs in the city explain only a small part of the flow cost of migration, and that most of it is non-monetary.
Keywords: Internal Migration; Workfare Programs; India; Urban; Rural JEL Classification: H53; J22; J61; O15; R23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-dev and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/c ... /459-2020_imbert.pdf
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cge:wacage:459
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Snape ().