Energy Transitions, Directed Technical Change and the British Industrial Revolution

Ravshonbek Otojanov ()

No 91, Working Papers from Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research

Abstract: This paper provides an alternative view on the transition from stagnation to growth by building a two-sector model of the British Industrial Revolution. The sectors differ only in the use of input factors, wood and coal. The model characterises the transition from stagnation to high growth as a direct consequence of the transition from biomass to coal use in Britain. Formalising the accounts of economic historians, technological progress is modelled as an endogenous process driven by the cost differentials between wood and coal. As wood price rises and coal price remains stable it becomes profitable to innovate in coal-using technologies and hence, innovation shifts to the coal-using sector. The model is calibrated to match the main features of the British economy in the transition period between 1550 and 1849. The model reproduces one of the important characteristics of the First Industrial Revolution – transition from low growth to high growth. Counterfactual analyses indicate that, absent coal reserves and low cost coal supplies, growth would have been slower and income per capita would have been 53% of that observed in 1849. Also, the model does a good job in explaining the timing of structural transformations in the British economy.

Keywords: Industrial Revolution; Economic Growth; Directed Technical Change; Innovation; Energy Transitions. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D50 O30 O41 Q43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-gro and nep-his
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://cgr.sbm.qmul.ac.uk/CGRWP91.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgs:wpaper:91

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pedro S. Martins ().