 USO cost allocation rules and welfareAndreas Haller, Christian Jaag and Urs Trinkner No 49, Working Papers from Swiss Economics Abstract: Universal service providers (USP) are increasingly active in business segments other than the segment consisting of their Universal Service Obligation (USO). Price regulation of USO services is usually cost-oriented and differentiated between USO- and non-USO-products. Hence, regulatory rules on cost allocation impact regulated prices and overall welfare. In this paper we analyse the effect of various cost allocation rules on the financing of USO, assuming a profit regulation in place. We use a stylized model with a set of products characterized by different price elasticities perceived by the USP. The model is calibrated for a scenario representing the postal market in industrialized countries. As a benchmark, we derive a welfare optimal allocation of costs based on Ramsey prices such that the incumbent USP breaks even. We then compare this result to cost allocation rules applied in practice: Fully distributed cost based on activities (ABC), and cost allocated according to a net cost rebalancing (NCR) mechanism. Under NCR, a regulated USP is allowed to reallocate the net cost of the USO through internal transfer payment. We find that cost allocation rules strongly affect prices and welfare under price control. NCR increases welfare clearly as compared to ABC. Keywords: USO; cost allocation; net cost rebalancing; ramsey pricing; ABC (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chc:wpaper:0049 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers from Swiss Economics Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.