Deforestation: Population or market driven? Different approaches in modelling agricultural expansion

Arild Angelsen ()

No WP 1996:9, CMI Working Papers from CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute), Bergen, Norway

Abstract: The debate on causes of and remedies for tropical deforestation is often confused because the underlying assumptions of the arguments are not made explicit. This paper compares four different modelling approaches to agricultural expansion and deforestation, and explores the implications of the underlying assumptions about the household objectives, the labour market, and the property rights regime. A major distinction is made between population and market driven approaches, and the labour market assumption is critical in this respect. Many of the popular policy prescriptions are based on the population approach. The paper shows that within a more realistic - particularly for the long term effects - market approach, well intentioned policies such as intensification programmes may boost deforestation. Many frontier agricultural systems are also characterised by open access where forest clearing gives farmers land rights. Deforestation therefore becomes a title establishment strategy. In this situation, land titling and credit programmes may increase deforestation.

Pages: pages
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chm:wpaper:wp1996-9

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CMI Working Papers from CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute), Bergen, Norway Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Robert Sjursen ().