Myopic preferences or subsistence income? Why do rickshaw cyclists rent the cycle?
Magnus Hatlebakk ()
No 1, CMI Working Papers from CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute), Bergen, Norway
One year rent is sufficient to buy a rickshaw in the plains of Nepal, while a rickshaw will last many years, so purchase appears very profitable. Still most cyclists rent the rickshaw. Based on choices made by rickshaw pullers between hypothetical financing schemes for rickshaws we investigate whether the explanation is a high time-preference rate or a high elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption, which in turn can be explained by preferences that are formed by consumption near a subsistence level. We find that subsistence constraints are more important than myopic preferences.
Keywords: Investment behavior; Poverty; Time-preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/4368-myopic-p ... bsistence-income.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chm:wpaper:wp2012-1
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CMI Working Papers from CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute), Bergen, Norway Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Robert Sjursen ().