EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The no-arbitrage hypothesis and inertia in forward markets

José Luis Ferreira, Praveen Kujal and Stephen Rassenti

Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute

Abstract: Allaz (1992) showed that the no-arbitrage condition in forward markets is obtained as a feature of the equilibrium if the model allows for strategic behavior on the part of the buyers. He showed that having active buyers is equivalent to passive buyers plus the no-arbitrage hypothesis. We test this experimentally in a forward market by allowing for active buyer’s under exogenously or endogenously determined market closure. We further test an inertia hypothesis that looks at whether past participation in a spot-market results in quantities being limited in the forward market stage. Importantly, the no-arbitrage condition can only be tested with both real buyers and sellers participating in a forward market. We find that the no-arbitrage hypothesis does not hold. Prices in the forward market are higher than in the spot. The inertia hypothesis is not supported either. Even though almost competitive levels of output are observed, sellers obtain a third of the total surplus. We confirm earlier experimental results on competition enhancing effects of forward markets.

Keywords: Oligopoly; forward markets; no-arbitrage hypothesis; futures pricing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 G13 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/361/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chu:wpaper:22:02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Megan Luetje ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:22:02