Development of a questionnaire to elicit public preferences regarding health inequalities

Rebecca Shaw, Paul Dolan, Aki Tsuchiya (), Alan Williams, Peter Smith () and Roger Burrows
Additional contact information
Peter Smith: Centre for Health Economics, The University of York

No 040cheop, Working Papers from Centre for Health Economics, University of York

Abstract: A review of relevant literature within health economics, psychology and moral philosophy suggests that people want resource allocation decisions in health to be informed by considerations of equity as well as efficiency. A number of empirical studies demonstrate that people are willing to sacrifice overall health benefits for a more equal distribution of health (Dolan and Shaw, 2001a). However, it is not clear from the available evidence exactly which distributional considerations people want to take into account when allocating resources. Further, on the whole, discussions about equity are rarely cast in quantitative terms (but see Olsen, 1994) and so it is not clear to what extent people want various equity notions to be taken into account. In this study funded by the ESRC Health Variations Programme, we have elicited the views of the general public in order to quantify people’s preferences regarding equity in health. The two-year study first explored whether people wish to give differential priority to groups with different characteristics (such as age, family responsibilities and the extent to which people are ‘responsible’ for their illness). The study then derived a way of asking questions on various inequality issues which enable people to indicate their strength of preference for different sorts of reduction in health inequalities. This paper reports upon these attempts to present to members of the general public meaningful trade-offs between efficiency and equity. The purpose of this paper is to report on the development of the questions and to indicate how they might be used by other researchers. Part A shows how the questions were developed from a series of pilot interviews and made suitable for use in either an interview setting or postal survey. Part B provides some guidance on administration and reproduces the questions in order to make them available to interested researchers and policy makers. Those readers whose main aim is to access the questions, may wish to move straight in to Part B.

Keywords: inequality; rationing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 44 pages
Date: 2001-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/o ... nal%20Paper%2040.pdf First version, 2001 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chy:respap:40cheop

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Health Economics, University of York Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gill Forder ().