Stock Grants as Commitment Device
Gian Luca Clementi,
Thomas Cooley and
Cheng Wang
No 2002-E12, GSIA Working Papers from Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business
Abstract:
A large and increasing fraction of the value of executives' compensation is accounted for by security grants. It is often argued that the optimal compensation contracts characterized in the theoretical literature can be implemented by means of stock or option grants. However, in most cases the optimal allocation can be implemented simply by a contingent sequence of cash payments. Security awards are redundant. In this paper we develop a dynamic model of managerial compensation where neither the firm nor the manager can commit to long-term contracts. We show that, in this environment, if stock grants are not used, then the optimal contract collapses to a series of short term contracts. When stock grants are used, however, nonlinear intertemporal schemes can be implemented to achieve better risk-sharing and larger firm value.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://rimini.tepper.cmu.edu/Papers/stock.pdf
Related works:
Journal Article: Stock grants as a commitment device (2006) 
Working Paper: Stock Grants As a Commitment Device (2006)
Working Paper: Stock Grants as a Committment Device (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmu:gsiawp:1025802450
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://student-3k.t ... /gsiadoc/GSIA_WP.asp
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GSIA Working Papers from Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Steve Spear ().