Mobility and Continuity of Political Elites over Phases of Regime Change
Tomoko Matsumoto and
No 17-004E, CIGS Working Paper Series from The Canon Institute for Global Studies
Despite its significance for regime change and state building, the impact of regime change on elite group has not received adequate scholarly attention. Using the newly constructed 2,979 government elites data after the Meiji Restoration in Japan, this Does changing the form of government actually change who are in power? Despite its significance for regime change and state building, the impact of regime change on the elite group has not received adequate scholarly attention. The new data on 2,980 government elites since the Meiji Restoration Japan (1868) revealed the three results: (i) the proportion of elites whose fathers were elites in the former regime is low in the regime transition phase but increases in the regime consolidation phase, (ii) the proportion of elites whose fathers were commoners increases throughout the regime change process, and (iii) the internal hierarchy of political elites begins to more intensively reflect the social stratum of the former regime and discount the people's own talents as the new regime consolidates. Regime change increases social mobility in the elite society but it does not last long.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cnn:wpaper:17-004e
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CIGS Working Paper Series from The Canon Institute for Global Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The Canon Institute for Global Studies ().