Teacher assessments versus standardized tests: is acting "girly" an advantage?
L. Casula and
Adriana Di Liberto ()
Working Paper CRENoS from Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia
We study if Italian teachers do apply gender discrimination when judging students. To this aim, we use a difference-in-differences approach that exploits the availability of both teachers (non-blind) and standardized test (blind) scores in math and language that Italian students receive during the school year. Using data for all sixth graders, descriptives show that in both scores girls are better than boys in language, while in math boys perform better than girls in the blind test. Moreover, our analysis suggest that boys are always discriminated by teachers in both subjects. This result holds also when we control for class fixed effects, students noncognitive skills, gender specific-attitude towards cheating and possible cultural differences towards gender attitudes in math or language.
Keywords: schooling outcomes; Gender stereotypes; discrimination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-eur and nep-gen
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Teacher Assessments versus Standardized Tests: Is Acting "Girly" an Advantage? (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cns:cnscwp:201701
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper CRENoS from Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CRENoS ().