Certainty vs. Severity Revisited: Evidence for Colombia
Camilo Acosta (),
Daniel Mejia () and
Angela Zorro M. ()
Documentos CEDE from Universidad de los Andes - CEDE
A recurring debate in the literature on crime control is whether an increase in the probability of punishment is a more effective deterrent than an increase in the severity of the sanction. This paper further explores this issue in the context of crime in Colombia. We use a natural policy experiment (the introduction of the Adversarial System of Criminal Justice) to estimate how changes in the costs associated with criminal activity have affected crime rates in the country. The results show that for the Colombian case, when a reform reduces the probability of punishment it leads to an increase in crime rates across a variety of different types of criminal activity, including both violent crimes and property theft. Moreover, our evidence suggests that changes in the probability of punishment have greater impact in crime rates than changes in its severity. This has important implications for public policy regarding crime rates and the design of judicial mechanisms.
Keywords: Law and Economics; Crime Economics; Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure; Certainty; Severity; Colombia. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000089:014634
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Documentos CEDE from Universidad de los Andes - CEDE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Universidad De Los Andes-Cede ().