Development Accounting: Conceptually Flawed and Inconsistent with Empirical Evidence

Theodore Breton ()

No 12435, Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público from Universidad EAFIT

Abstract: Development accounting depends on two simplifying assumptions, that economies can be represented by a common aggregate production function and that aggregate factors of production are paid their social marginal products. An aggregate production function can explain income across countries, but the mathematics of the aggregate production function and the empirical evidence both indicate that aggregate factors are paid a small fraction of their social marginal products. As a consequence, development accounting underestimates the income differences due to human capital and overestimates the differences due to TFP. This error cannot be corrected because human capital’s social marginal product is not observable.

Keywords: Development Accounting; Human Capital; External Effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E13 O O11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20
Date: 2014-08-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstream/handle/1 ... quence=1&isAllowed=y

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000122:012435

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público from Universidad EAFIT Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Valor Público EAFIT - Centro de estudios e incidencia ().