EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Tren interoceánico elevado del Chocó: ambición logística, riesgo fiscal y decisiones por etapas

Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-Betancur
Additional contact information
Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-Betancur: Centro de Investigaciones Económicas y Financieras (CIEF), Escuela de Economía y Finanzas Universidad EAFIT

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Juan Carlos Gutierrez Betancur

Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público from Universidad EAFIT

Abstract: This paper assesses the feasibility of the Chocó Interoceanic Railway project in Colombia, a government initiative aimed at connecting the Pacific and Atlantic oceans via a ~267 km rail corridor. Using an economic engineering and public economics framework, we estimate its costs, benefits, and risks through international benchmarks and robust methodologies designed to mitigate optimistic bias. The valuation incorporates Reference Class Forecasting (RCF), applying prudential cost uplifts of 44% (P50) and 66% (P80) to baseline estimates. Cash flows are discounted at a 5% real social discount rate. The findings reveal three critical challenges. First, the officially estimated capital expenditures (CAPEX) are substantially lower than international benchmarks, which suggest an investment between COP 107 and 320 trillion (USD 100–300 million/km). Second, under realistic CAPEX and operating expenditure (OPEX) assumptions, the benefit-cost (B/C) ratio does not robustly exceed the viability threshold of 1. Third, the project's annualized fiscal pressure on the National General Budget (PGN) is estimated to be between 5% and 8%, a level incompatible with the available fiscal space, which would crowd out priority investments in sectors such as health or education. Instead of dismissing the project, a modular and conditional roadmap is recommended. The suggested public policy is to advance in phased sections, authorizing future budgetary commitments (vigencias futuras) only after meeting verifiable milestones: nearly complete engineering designs (~80%), secured environmental and land permits (≥95%), and a B/C ratio of P50 ≥ 1 for each section. Without these safeguards, committing large-scale future resources represents an imprudent fiscal risk.

Keywords: Infrastructure megaprojects; project appraisal; Reference Class Forecasting (RCF); social discount rate; Benefit/Cost analysis; risk governance; public finance. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 D81 H43 H54 R48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in https://universidadeafit.widen.net/view/pdf/0s8jx5mevo/Documento-de-trabajo-tren-interoceanico-elevado-del-choco.pdf?u=amlqiy

Downloads: (external link)
https://universidadeafit.widen.net/view/pdf/0s8jx5 ... l-choco.pdf?u=amlqiy
None

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000122:023616

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público from Universidad EAFIT Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Valor Público EAFIT - Centro de estudios e incidencia ().

 
Page updated 2026-09-18
Handle: RePEc:col:000122:023616