EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Preferences, Uncertainty, and Biases in Land Division: A Bargaining Experiment in the Field

Margarita Gafaro and César Mantilla

No 18983, Documentos de trabajo - Alianza EFI from Alianza EFI

Abstract: Divisions of rural land in developing countries reduce the possibilities of farmers to profit from agricultural returns to scale. We design and conduct a framed bargaining experiment to study whether land overvaluation (due to affective reasons) and uncertainty in land values are drivers for land division. In our bargaining game, two players with different agricultural productivity jointly inherit a land plot and individually inherit some tokens they can use to agree on a land allocation. The possible set of land allocations and the spread of land returns vary across treatment arms in the game. We conduct this experiment with 256 participants in eight rural municipalities of the Northeast of Colombia. We find that when players are allowed to divide the land plot, 75% of the bargaining interactions yield the most egalitarian, but less efficient, land allocations. Based on the predictions of a Nash bargaining model and the observations from a sample of 120 college students, we rule out land overvaluation as a driver for land divisions in the context of our game. We also find that uncertainty in land yields reduces the efficiency of land allocations when we do not allow land divisions, by increasing the likelihood of the least productive player keeping the entire land plot. Our results are consistent with a bounded rationality rule in which subjects incorporate a behavioral response to uncertainty by first bargaining over land, which is a certain outcome, and then bargaining over a token transfer.

Keywords: land division; Nash bargaining; affective value of land; nonuse value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 C90 O13 Q15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 62
Date: 2019-09-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-exp, nep-gth and nep-ore
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://alianzaefi.com/download/preferences-uncert ... riment-in-the-field/

Related works:
Working Paper: Preferences, Uncertainty, and Biases in Land Division: A Bargaining Experiment in the Field (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000561:018983

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Documentos de trabajo - Alianza EFI from Alianza EFI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alianza EFI ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:col:000561:018983