Volunteer work and club size: Nash equilibrium and optimality
Robin Boadway (),
Maurice Marchand and
Pierre Pestieau ()
Additional contact information
Maurice Marchand: CORE, Université catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
No 1992040, CORE Discussion Papers from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE)
The non-cooperative provision of public goods is analysed in the context of a two-stage game in which club size is determined endogenously. Equilibrium club size and voluntary labour supply are shown to be inefficient. The impact of optimally-chosen fiscal policies using simple instruments is studied. When agents do not derive nonpecuniary benefits from volunteer work, lump-sum grants can be used to implement the first-best equal treatment allocation but private provision is fully crowded out. Otherwise, it is found that simple fiscal instruments cannot implement the first-best equal-treatment allocation unless club size is directly regulated.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
Journal Article: Volunteer work and club size: Nash equilibrium and optimality (1997)
Working Paper: Volunteer work and club size: Nash equilibrium and optimality (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cor:louvco:1992040
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CORE Discussion Papers from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE) Voie du Roman Pays 34, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alain GILLIS ().