Stationarity of Heterogeneity in Production Technology using Latent Class Modelling

Per Agrell () and H. Brea-Solís ()
Additional contact information
H. Brea-Solís: HEC Management School, University of Liege

No 2015047, LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE)

Abstract: Latent class modelling (LC) has been advanced as a promising alternative for addressing heterogeneity in frontier analysis models, in particular those where the individual scores are used in regulatory settings. If the production possibility set contains multiple distinct technologies, pooled approaches would result in biased results. We revisit the fundamentals of production theory and formulate a set of criteria for identification of heterogeneity: completeness (the inclusion of all data in the analysis), stationarity (the temporal stability of the identified production technologies), and endogeneity (no ad hoc determination of the cardinality of the classes). We also distinguish between the identification of a sporadic idiosyncratic shock, an outlier observation, and the identification of a time-persistent technology. Using a representative data set for regulation (a panel for Swedish electricity distributors 2000-2006), we test LC modelling for a Cobb-Douglas production function using the defined criteria. The LC results are compared to the pooled stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) model as a benchmark. Outliers are detected using an adjusted DEA super-efficiency procedure. Our results show that about 78% of the distributors are assigned to a single class, the remaining 22% split into two smaller classes that are non-stationary and largely composed of outliers. It is hardly conceivable that a production technology could change over this short horizon, implying that LC should be seen more as an enhanced outlier analysis than as a solid identification method for heterogeneity in the production set. More generally, we argue that the claim for heterogeneity in reference set deserves a more rigorous investigation to control for the multiple effects of sample size bias, specification error and the impact on functional form assumptions.

Keywords: Frontier analysis; latent class models; SFA; DEA; outliers; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 L51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-11-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-eff
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://sites.uclouvain.be/core/publications/coredp/coredp2015.html (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cor:louvco:2015047

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE) Voie du Roman Pays 34, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alain GILLIS ().