EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Rhineland exit

Lans Bovenberg () and C. N. Teulings ()

CPB Discussion Paper from CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis

Abstract: We advance three reasons for preferring the Anglo-Saxon business model above the Rhineland model. First, serving multiple stakeholders leads to ill-defined property rights. Second, giving workers a claim on the surplus of the firm raises the cost of capital for investments in jobs. Third, assigning the full surplus of the firm to shareholders provides the best possible social insurance by the diversification of firm-specific risks on capital markets. Whereas globalisation has increased firm-specific risk by intensifying competition, globalisation of capital markets has also greatly increased the scope for diversification of firm-specific risk. This is an efficient form of social insurance. Coordination in wage bargaining and collective norms on what is proper compensation play an important role in reducing the claim of workers on the firm's surplus. In Denmark, workers bear les firm-specific risk than workers in the United States do. Collective action thus has an important role to play. Politicians, however, also face the temptation to please voters and incumbent workers with short-run gains at the expense of exposing workers to firm-specific risks and reducing job creation for future generations.

JEL-codes: E2 G3 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/publicaties/download/rhineland-exit.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Rhineland exit? (2009) Downloads
Working Paper: Rhineland Exit? (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Rhineland Exit? (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Rhineland exit? (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Rhineland Exit? (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpb:discus:101

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CPB Discussion Paper from CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .

 
Page updated 2019-08-11
Handle: RePEc:cpb:discus:101