EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Unfairness at Work: Well-Being and Quits

Conchita D'Ambrosio (), Andrew Clark () and Marta Barazzetta

No 1802, CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) from CEPREMAP

Abstract: We here consider the effect of the level of income that individuals consider to be fair for the job they do, which we take as measure of comparison income, on both subjective well-being and objective future job quitting. In six waves of German Socio-Economic Panel data, the extent to which own labour income is perceived to be unfair is significantly negatively correlated with subjective well-being, both in terms of cognitive evaluations (life and job satisfaction) and affect (the frequency of feeling happy, sad and angry). Perceived unfairness also translates into objective labour-market behaviour, with current unfair income predicting future job quits.

Keywords: Fair income; subjective well-being; quits; SOEP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur, nep-hap and nep-ltv
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepremap.fr/depot/docweb/docweb1802.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Unfairness at work: Well-being and quits (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Unfairness at work: Well-being and quits (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Unfairness at Work: Well-Being and Quits (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Unfairness at Work: Well-Being and Quits (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpm:docweb:1802

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) from CEPREMAP Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mathieu Perona ().

 
Page updated 2020-02-18
Handle: RePEc:cpm:docweb:1802