Explaining a Paradox of Democracy: The Role of Institutions in Female Enfranchisement
Anna Maria Koukal and
CREMA Working Paper Series from Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)
Switzerland is known for its highly developed direct democracy. However, Swiss women were enfranchised at the federal level only in 1971 and in many cantons even later. We analyze the role of direct democracy in the delayed Swiss enfranchising process by investigating a novel dataset covering referenda among males about enfranchising women. Applying a difference-in-differences approach, we shed light on the conditions under which strong local direct democracy becomes a barrier to women’s suffrage. Our results are consistent with direct democracy having two effects: it boosts men’s demand to enfranchise women, but it also increases the price for men to do so. Depending on the specific conditions of the vote, the former or the latter effect dominates.
Keywords: women’s suffrage; municipal institutions; direct democracy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 J16 N24 N44 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.crema-research.ch/papers/2017-13.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
http://www.crema-research.ch/abstracts/2017-13.htm Abstract (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cra:wpaper:2017-13
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CREMA Working Paper Series from Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Anna-Lea Werlen ().