EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Confidence, Optimism and Litigation: A Litigation Model under Ambiguity

Nathalie Chappe () and Raphaël Giraud ()
Additional contact information
Nathalie Chappe: CRESE, Université de Franche-comté

No 2013-05, Working Papers from CRESE

Abstract: This paper introduces ambiguity into an otherwise standard litigation model. The aim is to take into account optimism and confidence on the plaintiff side. We examine the following questions : 1) How optimism and confidence affect the outcomes of the settlement stage? 2) How optimism and confidence affect the level of care? 3) As a result what are the public policy implications in terms of monitoring the level of confidence? We show that the equilibrium probability of settlement is increasing in the degree of optimism for every plaintiffs and increasing in the level of confidence for pessimistic plaintiffs, provided the sensitivity of plaintiffs to a rise in the settlement offer is high, and that the same holds for the level of care independently of the sensitivity of plaintiffs to rises in the settlement offer. Finally, assuming the objective of the government is to minimize the probability of litigation and assuming that it can only manipulate the level of confidence, we find that a clear recommendation is possible only in the case of a high sensitivity of plaintiffs to rises in the settlement offer: government intervention to raise public confidence in the judicial system is recommended only when plaintiffs are pessimistic about their chances of winning and in that case, as much as possible should be spent.

Keywords: confidence; ambiguity; litigation; behavioral law and economics. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K41 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23 pages
Date: 2013-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://crese.univ-fcomte.fr/uploads/wp/WP-2013-05.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crb:wpaper:2013-05

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from CRESE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Chuffart ().

 
Page updated 2020-03-29
Handle: RePEc:crb:wpaper:2013-05