How is Digital Evidence Used in the International Criminal Court? A Theoretical and Empirical Approach

Yann Lecorps (), Khaoula Naili (), Marie Obidzinski (), Yves Oytana () and Téa Toutounji ()
Additional contact information
Yann Lecorps: Université Paris Panthéon Assas, CRED UR 7321, F-75005 Paris, France
Khaoula Naili: Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CRESE UR3190, F-25000 Besançon, France
Marie Obidzinski: Université Paris Panthéon Assas, CRED UR 7321, F-75005 Paris, France
Yves Oytana: Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CRESE UR3190, F-25000 Besançon, France
Téa Toutounji: Université Paris Panthéon Assas, CRED UR 7321, F-75005 Paris, France

No 2025-09, Working Papers from CRESE

Abstract: We examine the use of digital evidence in cases handled by the International Criminal Court (ICC) at different stages of the proceedings, both theoretically and empirically, and how the parties use it. Our theoretical findings indicate that the extent to which digital evidence is used versus classical evidence may increase or decrease with the stringency of the standard of proof. This variation depends on the cost of gathering evidence and the degree of complementarity between digital and classical evidence. Our main empirical findings are as follows: i) the intensity of references to classical evidence increases more than that of references to digital evidence between the pretrial and trial phases; ii) the prosecution appears to rely more on digital evidence than the defense; iii) there is a positive correlation between the emotional tone of the prosecution and the defense, but no correlation between their emotional tone and the reference to either types of evidence.

Keywords: International Criminal Court; digital evidence; standard of proof; social media; textual analysis; sentiment analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2025-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://crese.univ-fcomte.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/WP-2025-09.pdf First version, 2025 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crb:wpaper:2025-09

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from CRESE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laurent Kondratuk ().