The Cyclicality of Search Intensity in a Competitive Search Model
Paul Gomme () and
No 13002, Working Papers from Concordia University, Department of Economics
Shimer's puzzle is that the textbook Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model exhibits fluctuations in labor market variables that are an order of magnitude too small. Introducing search effort of the unemployed brings the model's predictions for these fluctuations very close to those seen in the data. The search cost function and the matching technology are intimately related and thus should be estimated simultaneously. Ignoring worker search effort leads to a large upward bias in the elasticity of matches with respect to vacancies. Evidence in support of the model's prediction of procyclical search effort is presented.
Keywords: Variable Search Effort; Educational Differences in Unemployment Volatility; Endogenous Matching Technology; Time Use; Wage Posting; Competitive Search (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 E32 J63 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-lab and nep-mac
Date: 2013-09, Revised 2013-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: The Cyclicality of Search Intensity in a Competitive Search Model (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crd:wpaper:13002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Concordia University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Economics Department ().