Voting on Unemployment Insurance Generosity

Stephane Pallage and Christian Zimmermann

No 64, Cahiers de recherche CREFE / CREFE Working Papers from CREFE, Université du Québec à Montréal

Abstract: In this paper, we show that in a dynamic general equilibrium economy, the presence of moral hazard need not induce large cuts in optimal unemployment insurance benefits when agents are asked to vote on these benefits. We find that it takes a quite large proportion of "shirkers" to bend the generosity of the unemployment insurance program desired by the median voter. This result stands in sharp contrast to the extant literature. In addtion to their differences in asset holdings, agents in our economy are heterogeneous in skills and may differ in their wage as well as in their transition in and out of unemployment. Our results have important implications in the light of recent unemployment insurance reforms.

Dans cette étude, nous montrons que le risque moral joue un maigre rôle dans la détermination de la générosité de l'assurance chômage optimale lors d'un vote. Dans une économie d'équilibre général dynamique, nous trouvons que seule la présence d'un nombre très important d'abuseurs conduit à une perte significative de générosité dans les allocations d'assurance chômage. Ce résultat va à l'encontre de la littérature existante. En plus de différences dans les actifs détenus, les agents modélisés diffèrent dans leurs habiletés, ce qui se traduit par des différences de salaires et de probabilités de chômage. Ces résultats peuvent avoir des conséquences importantes au vu des réformes récentes de l'assurance chômage.

Keywords: Unemployment Insurance; Shirking; Heterogeneity; Voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D7 E24 J65 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18 pages
Date: 1998-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-dge, nep-mic, nep-pbe, nep-pol and nep-pub
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in International Economic Review, (42(4), pp. 903-923, November 2001

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.unites.uqam.ca/eco/CREFE/cahiers/cah64.ps Main text (application/postscript)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.unites.uqam.ca/eco/CREFE/cahiers/cah64.ps [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://unites.uqam.ca/eco/CREFE/cahiers/cah64.ps)
http://www.unites.uqam.ca/eco/CREFE/cahiers/cah64.pdf Main text (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.unites.uqam.ca/eco/CREFE/cahiers/cah64.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://unites.uqam.ca/eco/CREFE/cahiers/cah64.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cre:crefwp:64

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cahiers de recherche CREFE / CREFE Working Papers from CREFE, Université du Québec à Montréal P.O. Box 8888, Downtown Station, Montreal (Canada) Quebec, H3C 3P8. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stéphane Pallage ().