EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Une expérience d'intégration entre analyse quantitative et qualitative: l’évaluation de la formation professionnelle en Région Piémont [An integration of quantitative and qualitative research methods: the evaluation of vocational training in Piedmont Region]

Igor Benati () and Valentina Lamonica ()
Additional contact information
Igor Benati: Ceris - Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth,Turin, Italy
Valentina Lamonica: Ceris - Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth,Turin, Italy

CERIS Working Paper from CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY

Abstract: Impact assessment, in public policy evaluation, faces two major challenges: on the one hand, the theme of impact measurement, on the other that of its explanation. Quantitative research techniques usually play a vital role in the measurement, while qualitative techniques are much more useful in explanation. In order to carry on a successful impact assessment is therefore necessary to integrate the first with the second, combining them in a balanced research design. The use of mixed methods in this direction, allows to overcome some criticism to quantitative approach, as well as to qualitative approach. But how is it possible to achieve an effective integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in impact assesment? The article attempts to answer this question. After a brief theoretical excursus on the use of mixed methods in evaluation research, with the presentation of three different theoretical options for use of mixed methods (sequential, concurrent, and transformative), the paper describes a single experience of integration between qualitative and quantitative methods, based on the analysis of employment effects of vocational training, experienced in Piedmont Region, within the independent evaluation of the ESF Operational Programme. The paper explain the choices made in research design, discussing the positive and critical.

Keywords: public policy evaluation; impact assessment; mixed methods; vocational training (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B41 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 2014-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.byterfly.eu/islandora/object/librib:339473 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:csc:cerisp:201413

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CERIS Working Paper from CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anna Perin () and Giancarlo Birello ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-03
Handle: RePEc:csc:cerisp:201413