Theocracy and Resilience Against Economic Sanctions

Alireza Naghavi and Giuseppe Pignataro

No 383, Development Working Papers from Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano

Abstract: This paper provides a simply theory to explain the impact of sanctions on a regime's policies and behavior. Sanctions are generally put to strip the target country from its available rents and weaken the government's stance against growing discontent in the population. We show however that sanc-tions may give legitimacy to an incumbent government by influencing the optimal level of religious ideology provided by the state and further stabilizing its grip to power and rents. While in a good state of nature sanctions build resilience as long as religious ideology among the population is strong, at bad times they compel the target country to move towards ideological moderation. In a world of asymmetric information, the target country always finds it optimal to send a signal that tru-ly represents the prevailing state of nature in order to induce learning and reach a win-win outcome.

Date: 2015-04-14
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.dagliano.unimi.it/media/WP2014_383.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Theocracy and resilience against economic sanctions (2015)
Working Paper: Theocracy and Resilience Against Economic Sanctions (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:csl:devewp:383

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Development Working Papers from Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chiara Elli ().