On the Inconsistence between the Long-period Method and the Assumption of Given Quantities
Fabio D'Orlando and
Sergio Nisticò ()
No 2009-05, Working Papers from Universita' di Cassino, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche
According to Sraffian economists, both the aggregate and the general equilibrium versions of the neoclassical theory suffer from a logical inconsistence that prevents them from identifying a long-period position. The aim of this paper is to show that also Sraffa’s approach, based on the assumption of given sectoral outputs, brings about an inconsistence between his theory and the long-period method. The main upshot of our argument is that sectoral outputs can legitimately be left to a separate stage of the theory only insofar as the long-period method is dropped and the classical-type theory is reconstructed within the temporary equilibrium method.
Keywords: classical-type approach; Sraffian theory; long period; short period; temporary equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B12 B41 D11 D21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 19 pages
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dipeg-wpe.unicas.it/dipse/files/wp200905.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:css:wpaper:2009-05
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Universita' di Cassino, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche Via S. Angelo Loc. Folcara 03043 Cassino (FR) - Italy. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gennaro Zezza ().