Does Labour Market Rationing Entail (Involuntary) Unemployment ?

Michel De Vroey

No 1994021, LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)

Abstract: This article argues in favor of drawing a distinction between the concepts of labour rationing and unemployment, the former referring to the occurrence of excess supply in a given labour market, the latter to job-waiting activity. In a first part, the literature on the possible consequences of labour rationing is surveyed. In a second part, a series of concepts and definitions which enable to single out the conditions under which labour rationing can result in involuntary unemployment, are put forward. Lucas’ widely accepted view that some job alternatives are always available will thereby be challenged. In part three, the relationship between labour rationing and (involuntary) unemployment is examined in the context of three regimes, a "Walrasian", a "Smithian" and a "Keynesian economy".

Keywords: employment; unemployment; wages (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28
Date: 1994-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctl:louvir:1994021

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Place Montesquieu 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Virginie LEBLANC ().