Economists, Value Judgments, and Climate Change: A View from Feminist Economics

Julie Nelson

No 07-03, GDAE Working Papers from GDAE, Tufts University

Abstract: A number of recent discussions about ethical issues in climate change, as engaged in by economists, have focused on the value of the parameter representing the rate of time preference within models of optimal growth. This essay examines many economists’ antipathy to serious discussion of ethical matters, and suggests that the avoidance of questions of intergenerational equity is related to another set of value judgments concerning the quality and objectivity of economic practice. Using insights from feminist philosophy of science and research on high reliability organizations, this essay argues that a more ethically transparent, real-world-oriented, and flexible economic practice would lead to more strongly objective, reliable, and useful knowledge.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/07-03EconValClimate.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/07-03EconValClimate.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2020/01/07-03EconValClimate.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics (2008)
Working Paper: Economists, Value Judgments, and Climate Change: A View From Feminist Economics (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dae:daepap:07-03

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GDAE Working Papers from GDAE, Tufts University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Abdulshaheed Alqunber ().