Why should the portfolios of mandatory private pension funds be captive? (the foreign investment question)
George de Menil
DELTA Working Papers from DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure)
Abstract:
Should the portfolios of mandatory, private pension funds in developing countries be invested exclusively in the home country? Or should their managers be free to make prudent investments anywhere in the world? Traditional portfolio analysis gives a clear answer from the point of view of the beneficiaries of the funds: Lifting geographic restraints expands the risk-reward frontier, and unequivocally enhances their welfare. However, if the balance of payments is constrained, capital outflows must be offset by compensating inflows. We assume that, when pension funds purchase foreign securities, the State is constrained to borrow an equal amount on international markets. We then use a simple model to analyze the resulting trade-offs. Chile, Argentina, Poland and Kazakhstan provide concrete examples of some of the issues discussed.
Date: 2003
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.delta.ens.fr/abstracts/wp200312.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.delta.ens.fr:80 (No such host is known. )
Related works:
Journal Article: Why should the portfolios of mandatory, private pension funds be captive? (The foreign investment question) (2005) 
Working Paper: Why should the portfolios of mandatory private pension funds becaptive ? (The foreign investment question) (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:del:abcdef:2003-12
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DELTA Working Papers from DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().