EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Signaling, Learning and Screening Prior to Trial: Informational Implications of Preliminary Injunctions

Thomas Jeitschko () and Byung-Cheol Kim ()

No 201102, EAG Discussions Papers from Department of Justice, Antitrust Division

Abstract: The decision to request a preliminary injunction—a court order that bans a party from certain actions until their lawfulness are ascertained in a final court ruling at trial—is an important litigation instrument in many areas of the law including antitrust, copyright, patents, trademarks, employment and labor relations as well as contracts. The process of filing for a preliminary injunction and the court's ruling on such a request generates information that can affect possible settlement decisions. We consider these implications when there is uncertainty about both the plaintiff's damages as well as the merits of case in the eyes of the court. Both plaintiff and defendant revise their beliefs about the case strength in dispute once they observe the court's ruling on preliminary injunctive relief. We study how such learning affects the likelihood of settlement. A precursor to this analysis is the study of the strategic role of preliminary injunctions as a means to signal the plaintiff's willingness to settle.

Keywords: preliminary injunction; learning; signaling; screening; litigation; pre-trial motion; settlement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D8 K12 K21 K41 J53 L4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2011-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta, nep-ipr and nep-pr~
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.justice.gov/atr/public/eag/267542a.html (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Signaling, Learning, and Screening Prior to Trial: Informational Implications of Preliminary Injunctions (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:doj:eagpap:201102

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EAG Discussions Papers from Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Department of Justice Antitrust Division 450 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20530. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tung Vu ().

 
Page updated 2021-06-13
Handle: RePEc:doj:eagpap:201102