Another Avenue for Anatomy of Income Comparisons: Evidence from Hypothetical Choice Experiments

Katsunori Yamada and Masayuki Sato

ISER Discussion Paper from Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka

Abstract: We present an original, large-scale, Internet-based survey that investigates how comparison attitudes vary by reference groups and individual comparison benchmarks. In this survey, respondents are presented with alternative combinations of hypothetical monthly income amounts, both for themselves and various reference persons -i.e., the average citizen in Japan; persons of a specific age, gender, and level of educational attainment; and friends and colleagues. From data on respondents' choices of preferred income scenario, we find that those who regard neighbors as their comparison benchmark have the strongest intensity of relative utility and that those whose comparison benchmark is colleagues do not compare intensively. We also find that respondents tend to be altruistic toward those with lower incomes than themselves and toward the elderly, but tend to be jealous of males and those with higher education or more income. Respondents who self-identify colleagues as their reference persons are uniformly jealous of the rivals, while those who identify friends as their reference persons are sometimes altruistic toward them.

Date: 2010-09, Revised 2012-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.iser.osaka-u.ac.jp/static/resources/docs/dp/2010/DP0795RRR.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dpr:wpaper:0795rrr

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ISER Discussion Paper from Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Librarian ().