Difference or Ratio: Implication of Status Preference on Stagnation
Yoshiyasu Ono and
Katsunori Yamada ()
ISER Discussion Paper from Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University
We consider a dynamic macroeconomic model of households that regard relative affluence as social status. The measure of relative affluence can be the ratio to, or the difference from, the social average. The two specifications lead to quite different equilibrium consequences: under the ratio specification full employment is necessarily realized, whereas under the difference specification there is a case where a persistent shortage of aggregate demand arises. Furthermore, using data of an affluence comparison experiment we empirically find that the difference specification fits the data better than the ratio specification. Therefore, affluence comparison can be a cause of persistent stagnation.
Date: 2012-10, Revised 2014-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Difference or Ratio: Implications of Status Preference on Stagnation (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dpr:wpaper:0856rr
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ISER Discussion Paper from Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Fumiko Matsumoto ().