On Legal Cooperation and the Dynamics of Legal Convergence
Bruno Deffains and
No 2010-17, EconomiX Working Papers from University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX
In this paper, we study the dynamics of legal convergence and the comparison between the different instruments of legal convergence based on cooperative strategies (i.e., harmonization and unification) or not. To study these questions we use a model with two nation-states which is inspired in part by that used in Carbonara and Parisi (2008) where preferences of each nation-state are such that it is costly to change the law, but it is also costly to have a different legal system from the other nation-state. We show that legal unification could be achieved in the long-run through small step by step changes despite the existence of huge harmonization costs in the short run. We also show that legal cooperation is not always necessary to achieve legal convergence.
Keywords: Law-and-Economics; Legal Convergence; Legal harmonization; Legal Uniformization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 K00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: On Legal Cooperation and the Dynamics of Legal Convergence (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:drm:wpaper:2010-17
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in EconomiX Working Papers from University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Valerie Mignon ().