Weighting function in the behavioral portfolio theory
No 07-07.RS, DULBEA Working Papers from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles
The Behavioral Portfolio Theory (BTP) developed by Shefrin and Statman (2000) considers a probability weighting function rather than the real probability distribution used in Markowitz’s Portfolio Theory (1952). The optimal portfolio of a BTP investor, which consists in a combination of bonds and lottery ticket, can differ from the perfectly diversified portfolio of Markowitz. We found that this particular form of portfolio is not due to the weighting function. In this article we explore the implication of weighting function in the portfolio construction. We prove that the expected wealth criteria (used by Shefrin and Statman), even if the objective probabilities were deformed, is not a sufficient condition for obtaining significantly different forms of portfolio. Not only probabilities but also future outcomes have to be transformed.
JEL-codes: G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15) Track citations by RSS feed
Published by: ULB, DULBEA
Downloads: (external link)
https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/13616/1/dul-0086.pdf dul-0086 (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Weighting Function in the Behavioral Portfolio Theory (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dul:wpaper:07-07rs
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... ulb.ac.be:2013/13616
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DULBEA Working Papers from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().