Pluralism In Economics And The Evaluation Of Economic Research In Italy
Marcella Corsi (),
Carlo D'Ippoliti () and
No 10-05, DULBEA Working Papers from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles
We analyse Italy’s research evaluation exercise to discuss the issue of evaluating re-search in economics. We claim that evaluation and its criteria, together with its linkage to research institutions’ financing, are likely to affect the direction of research, in a problematic way. We claim that the ranking criteria adopted in Italy bring to a risk of disregarding histori-cal methods in favour of quantitative and econometric methods, and heterodox schools in favour of mainstream approaches. In order to preserve pluralism and originality of research, we propose a simple quantita-tive index based on field-normalisation.
Keywords: Research evaluation; Contemporary research in economics; Italy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 A14 B20 B40 B50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18 p.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe, nep-pke and nep-sog
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/6030 ... dippoliti_lucidi.pdf 1005urpe_corsi_dippoliti_lucidi (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dul:wpaper:2013/60303
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://hdl.handle.ne ... ulb.ac.be:2013/60303
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DULBEA Working Papers from ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benoit Pauwels ().