Is India Shining?
Anurag Banerjee () and
Nilanjan Banik ()
No 2013_01, CEGAP Working Papers from Durham University Business School
We investigate the popular perception about economic reforms having benefitted only the richer districts between 1999/2000 and 2004/2005. Using the spatial dynamics of district level per-capita income we found that income distribution did not change between the years examined. We argue that this is because of per-capita income across districts being spatially positively correlated. We identify physical infrastructure, human capital, and factories, as factors responsible for increase in income for both the rich as well as the poor districts. Infrastructure, physical or social, is a key component of growth in India. A policy impact an lysis shows development of better drainage and potable water systems has a large impact on income. For the year 2001/02, we find that for every 1 per cent increase in closed drainage system and potable water, district-level median income increases by 1.39 per cent and 0.21 per cent, respectively.
Keywords: Districts of India; Income; Neighbourhood effect; Spatial Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/business/working-p ... P-IsIndiaShining.pdf main text (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Is India Shining? (2014)
Working Paper: Is India Shining? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dur:cegapw:2013_01
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEGAP Working Papers from Durham University Business School Durham University Business School, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB, England. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Tatiana Damjanovic ().