On optimal redistributive capital taxation
No 2016_07, CEGAP Working Papers from Durham University Business School
This paper addresses conflicting results regarding the optimal taxation of capital income. Judd (1985) proves that in steady state there should be no taxation of capital income. Lansing (1999) studies a logarithmic example of one of Judd’s models and finds that the optimal steady state tax on capital income is not always zero. it is positive in some specifications, negative in some others. There appears to be a contradiction. However, I show that Lansing derives his result by relaxing the hypotheses of Judd’s theorem -- with less restrictive hypotheses, a wider range of outcomes is possible. This raises the question of whether yet more outcomes are possible with yet weaker hypotheses. I find that the answer is no: the only possible interior steady states for the model are essentially Judd’s zero capital tax and Lansing’s unitary elasticity of marginal utility.
Keywords: Dynamic; optimal; taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge and nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/business/working-papers/redistributive.pdf main text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dur:cegapw:2016_07
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEGAP Working Papers from Durham University Business School Durham University Business School, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB, England. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Tatiana Damjanovic ().