Economics at your fingertips  

On optimal redistributive capital taxation

Leslie Reinhorn

No 2016_07, CEGAP Working Papers from Durham University Business School

Abstract: This paper addresses conflicting results regarding the optimal taxation of capital income. Judd (1985) proves that in steady state there should be no taxation of capital income. Lansing (1999) studies a logarithmic example of one of Judd’s models and finds that the optimal steady state tax on capital income is not always zero. it is positive in some specifications, negative in some others. There appears to be a contradiction. However, I show that Lansing derives his result by relaxing the hypotheses of Judd’s theorem -- with less restrictive hypotheses, a wider range of outcomes is possible. This raises the question of whether yet more outcomes are possible with yet weaker hypotheses. I find that the answer is no: the only possible interior steady states for the model are essentially Judd’s zero capital tax and Lansing’s unitary elasticity of marginal utility.

Keywords: Dynamic; optimal; taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge and nep-pbe
Date: 2016-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) main text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEGAP Working Papers from Durham University Business School Durham University Business School, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB, England. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Tatiana Damjanovic ().

Page updated 2018-03-10
Handle: RePEc:dur:cegapw:2016_07