A Note on Defining the Dependent Population Based on Age

Rachel H. Racelis and John Michael Ian Salas
Additional contact information
Rachel H. Racelis: PIDS

Development Economics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract: Dependent population is defined as that part of the population that does not work and relies on others for the goods and services they consume. In practice, specific population age groups have in their entirety been categorized as dependent population, even while the definition may not necessarily apply to every individual in the population with the indicated ages. In general those categorized as dependents include the children and the elderly. The rest of the population constitutes the working age population. The delineation of any boundary for children and for working ages varies across countries and studies, has tended to be discretionary, and thus appears arbitrary. In the Philippines the delineation is based on the legal definition for working ages set at 15 to 64 years (with provision for early retirement at age 60 years.). The implied dependent ages in the Philippines are then 0-14 years and 60 or 65 years and older. The dependent ages used in the OECD definition for dependency ratio are under 20 and over 64. In other studies, children include those in the population up to age 18 or 20 and those in the working ages limited to 59 years or younger. This paper shows that the dependent population(s) defined based on a given set of age cut-offs are generally heterogeneous in terms of personal attributes, particularly in terms of indicators of dependency or non-dependency. Thus, the population defined by any given age boundaries may satisfy some indicators of dependency but not others. That is, the age boundary delineated using one dependency indicator, as reference, could be found unsatisfactory when assessed based on a different indicator. Those considering the use of any defined set of age boundaries to identify the dependent populations, whether for research or for the implementation of support programs, should first assess the appropriateness of the boundaries for the intended use. Identifying the dependency indicators relevant to the intended use would facilitate the assessment.

Keywords: population dependency; labor force participation; household headship; National Transfer Accounts; lifecycle deficit; financing consumption (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E21 E22 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/22684 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 301 [REDIRECT LOOP] Moved Permanently (http://www.eaber.org/node/22684 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22684 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22684 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22684 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22684 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22684 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22684 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22684)

Related works:
Working Paper: A Note on Defining the Dependent Population Based on Age (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:develo:22684

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Development Economics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().