Comments on “A selective overview of nonparametric methods in financial econometricsâ€Â

Peter Phillips and Jun Yu

Finance Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract: In recent years there has been increased interest in using nonparametric methods to deal with various aspects of financial data. The paper by Fan overviews some nonparametric techniques that have been used in the financial econometric literature, focusing on estimation and inference for diffusion models in continuous time and estimation of state price and transition density functions. Our comments on Fans paper will concentrate on two issues that relate in important ways to the papers focus on misspecification and discretization bias and the role of nonparametric methods in empirical finance. The first issue deals with the finite sample effects of various estimation methods and their implications for asset pricing. A good deal of recent attention in the econometric literature has focused on the benefits of full maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of diffusions and mechanisms for avoiding discretization bias in the construction of the likelihood. However, many of the problems of estimating dynamic models that are well known in discrete time series, such as the bias in ML estimation, also manifest in the estimation of continuous time systems and affect subsequent use of these estimates, for instance in derivative pricing. In consequence, a relevant concern is the relative importance of the estimation and discretization biases. As we will show below, the former often dominates the latter even when the sample size is large (at least 500 monthly observations, say). Moreover, it turns out that correction for the finite sample estimation bias continues to be more important when the diffusion component of the model is itself misspecified. Such corrections appear to be particularly important in models that are nonstationary or nearly nonstationary.

Keywords: nonparametric methods; financial data; Fan; empirical finance; discretization bias; misspecification; ML estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C14 G00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/22469 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 301 [REDIRECT LOOP] Moved Permanently (http://www.eaber.org/node/22469 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22469 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22469 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22469 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22469 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22469 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22469 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22469)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:financ:22469

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().