Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence
Fali Huang (flhuang@smu.edu.sg) and
Peter Cappelli
Labor Economics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research
Abstract:
Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen job candidates to find workers with a stronger work ethic who require less monitoring. This should be especially useful in work systems where monitoring by supervisors is more difficult, such as teamwork systems. We analyze the relationship between screening and monitoring in the context of a principal-agent model and test the theoretical results using a national sample of U.S. establishments, which includes information on employee selection. We find that employers screen applicants more intensively for work ethic where they make greater use of systems such as teamwork where monitoring is more difficult. This screening is also associated with higher wages, as predicted by the theory : The synergies between reduced monitoring costs and high performance work systems enable the firm to pay higher wages to attract and retain such workers. Screening for other attributes, such as work experiences and academic performance, does not produce these results.
Keywords: Employee Screening; Monitoring; Work Ethic; High Performance Work Practices; Principal-Agent Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J30 M51 M54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/22446 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 301 [REDIRECT LOOP] Moved Permanently (http://www.eaber.org/node/22446 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22446 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22446 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22446 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22446 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22446 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22446 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22446)
Related works:
Working Paper: Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence (2007) 
Working Paper: Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence (2006) 
Working Paper: Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence (2006) 
Working Paper: Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:laborw:22446
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Labor Economics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong (shiro.armstrong@anu.edu.au).